“Good Will Hunting”: Cognitive Dissonance Essay

result track down, played by Matt Damon, in the movie Good allow for Hunting is the epitome of a psychological paradigm. He can be analyzed in so many ways, touching on many of the different fields of psychology. The close inte lie downing thing almost lead is the cognitive randomness he goes by through come out the film. He is torn betwixt these two cognitions, both of which contradict for each one other. One of these cognitions is the fact that he is an deprive from South Boston, meaning he should all have a low stip destroy job and live there for the rest of his life. It would be wrong of him to forget about his roots and try to become manything of himself, which would be unfair to his friends who arent as delightful as Will. On the other hand, he is a profoundly smart individually to such a degree that Prof. Gerald Lambeau compares him to Einstein. He knows he has potential to get out of South Boston and perchance do many great things with his superior comprehe nsion, but he makes himself believe he doesnt want to because of this other cognition. This cognitive dissension he bares is the one main thing that keeps him from making a concrete finality of moving on to be something better.His word of honor is also something spectacular to look at, curiously from a psychological approach. Although he has a much higher intelligence service than others, the intelligence he has is concentrated on altogether one aspect of intelligence. His Componential intelligence is so over developed that it possibly caused the underdevelopment of his contextual intelligence and steamy intelligence. His Componential intelligence is seemingly much higher than others, which is seen when he whole shebang these complex math equations with such ease. His want of contextual intelligence is made really clear by Sean Maguire, his psychologist, played by Robin Williams. In one cross scene, Sean breaks down Will by stating that every(prenominal) response Will has to anything comes from a book. no(prenominal) of his responses come from real world experiences and accordingly he has no real companionship of the things you just cant reckon from books, such as love. One object lesson is when Will speaks about Seans wife, he obviously had no knowledge of the painful sensation or suffering Sean went through, but acted as if he did because he analyzed a painting Sean did. He is also absent emotional intelligence substantially, which is shown regularly throughout the film. The scarcity of this part of his intelligence is possibly due to the fact he was overcome numerous of times as a child. Thiscaused his intelligence to possibly becoming unripened in some parts and extremely established in others. An example of this is sheer throughout almost all the scenes with his just about girlfriend Skylar, played by Minnie Driver. He doesnt quite know how to carry with relationships, mainly because he is lacking in this part of his intelligence , especially those relationships with the opposite sex. through with(predicate) numerous of sessions with Sean and the aide of Skylar and his friend Chuckie, Will begins to confront this Cognitive dissonance. Not exclusively does he realize that he thus has a gift that needs to be utilized, but he also confronts this emotional intelligence deficiency by maturing it a bit and realizing that its not continuously bad to let someone at bottom and discover who you really are. By the end of the story Will has matured vastly in all aspects of Cognition. His emotional intelligence has increased greatly a huge with his Contextual intelligence. He also has found some Cognitive Consistency, which is what many people long for, especially those with extreme cognitive dissonance such as Will did.